Take Legal Action With This Document Against Covid Policies
Representing yourself against Covid mandates just got a lot easier with this document. All you need to do is tailor it for your city, province, workplace or any other place that violates your rights and freedoms. Feel free to copy and save it. This is not legal advice nor should it be construed as legal advice. If you need legal advice, please consult a civil lawyer near you.
If your employer puts a mandate in place, you can sue to receive a severance and or up to 2 full years pay! Please seek legal advice. You can get up to 30 minutes of free legal advice through your provincial lawyer referral service.
#KnowYourRights
Today’s Date
Between: Your Employer
Employers Address
and: Your Name
Your Address
To whom it may concern,
I am writing in relation to
the recent notice to all Name of Workplace employees on Insert Date in regards to a memorandum titled “Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19)
Announcement: Vaccines for All Staff” sent to all employees of the Name of Workplace.
I am not going to disclose
my vaccination status to Your Employer or
Manager as my medical health is protected under the
Privacy Act R.S.C., 1985, c. P-21.
My medical health and
choices are private and confidential and I am not required to disclose them to
anyone. My Employer does not have the right to ask me about my vaccination status. My privacy
is protected under the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents
Act, 2000 (PIPEDA) as well as the Personal Health Information Protection Act,
2004 (PHIPA) as well as the Provincial
Occupational Health and Safety Act, R.S.O.
1990, c. O.1 and the Municipal Freedom of Information and
Protection of Privacy Act, RSO 1990. The same privacy laws apply to all
members.
Furthermore, in light of
any future "memorandum’s” that may come down in relation to COVID-19
mandates, I am not going to consent to any type of COVID-19 testing that the Employer or Manager may
mandate. I do not give my informed consent.
Informed consent means that
the person who will administer the medical treatment or procedure, needs to inform
you of all the benefits and risks associated with the medical treatment or
procedures as well as alternative treatments before you decide if you will
consent or not. This is medical freedom. These are our God-given inalienable
rights.
Elements of consent: your
expressed, informed and explicit consent (voluntary) must be obtained prior
to treatment. Without consent it is considered assault under the Criminal Code
of Canada. Consent given under fear or duress is not consent.
Section 265(3) of the Criminal Code of Canada defines consent in relation to
assault as:
Consent
(3) For the
purposes of this section, no consent is obtained where the complainant submits
or does not resist by reason of
·
(a) the
application of force to the complainant or to a person other than the
complainant;
·
(b) threats
or fear of the application of force to the complainant or to a person other
than the complainant;
·
(c) fraud;
or
·
(d) the
exercise of authority.
The Your Province Health Care Consent Act, 1996 defines
“consent” as well :
Consent to
Treatment
No
treatment without consent
10 (1) A health
practitioner who proposes a treatment for a person shall not administer the
treatment, and shall take reasonable steps to ensure that it is not
administered, unless,
(a)
he or she is of the opinion that the person is capable with respect to the
treatment, and the person has given consent; or
(b) he or she is of the
opinion that the person is incapable with respect to the treatment, and the
person’s substitute decision-maker has given consent on the person’s behalf in
accordance with this Act. 1996, c. 2, Sched. A, s. 10 (1).
Elements of consent
11 (1) The following
are the elements required for consent to treatment:
1.
The consent must relate to the treatment.
2.
The consent must be informed.
3.
The consent must be given voluntarily.
4.
The consent must not be obtained through misrepresentation or fraud.
1996, c. 2, Sched. A, s. 11 (1).
Treatment is defined in the Your
Province Health
Care Consent Act, 1996 as follows:
“means
anything that is done for a therapeutic, preventive, palliative, diagnostic,
cosmetic or other health-related purpose, and includes a course of treatment,
plan of treatment or community treatment plan”. This definition would include
any vaccination or any COVID-19 test, as they are both, allegedly,
“preventive”, “diagnostic” and for a “health-related purpose”.
The
Nuremberg Code, to which Canada is a signatory, states that it is essential
before performing a medical procedure on human beings, that there is voluntary
informed consent. It also confirms a person involved should have legal capacity
to give consent, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud,
deceit, duress, overreaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion;
and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the
subject matter involved as to enable him/her to make an informed decision.
Nuremberg Code:
Article 6, Section 1:
Any preventative,
diagnostic and therapeutic medical intervention is only to be carried out with
the prior, free and informed consent of the person concerned, based on adequate
information. The consent should, where appropriate, be expressed and may be
withdrawn by the person concerned at any time and for any reason without
disadvantage or prejudice.
Nuremberg Code: Article 6: Section 3:
In no case should a
collective community agreement or the consent of a community leader or other
authority substitute for an individual’s informed consent.
If the Employer or Manager or the
City of Your City mandate
any type of COVID-19 vaccination or test (including the rapid antigen test), you
will also be in breach of the Nuremberg Code, without the informed consent of
the patient.
Furthermore, the Supreme
Court of Canada has well established case law that deals with medical treatment
without the informed consent of the patient. Case law, to some in the legal field, would be regarded
as the most recent, gold-standard-type of law. Case law cannot be overturned or
overruled without new case law on that issue. The Supreme Court of Canada has
made it clear that it is unconstitutional to force medical treatment of
any kind without the informed consent of the patient. Any action taken in
contravention of case law, would be unlawful.
In terms of accessing my health records, the Your Province Occupational
Health and Safety Act also speaks to this. Under the Your Province Occupational
Health and Safety Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. O.1 under Section 63(2) it states:
Information
confidential
Employer access to health records
(2) No employer shall seek to
gain access, except by an order of the court or other tribunal or in order to
comply with another statute, to a health record concerning a worker without the
worker’s written consent. R.S.O. 1990, c. O.1, s. 63 (2).
Also under the Your Province Occupational Health and Safety
Act, R.S.O. 1990, c O.1 it outlines penalties:
PART
IX
OFFENCES AND PENALTIES
Penalties
66 (1) Every person who
contravenes or fails to comply with,
(a) a
provision of this Act or the regulations;
(b) an
order or requirement of an inspector or a Director; or
(c) an
order of the Minister,
is guilty of an offence and on
conviction is liable to a fine of not more than $100,000 or to imprisonment for
a term of not more than twelve months, or to both. R.S.O. 1990,
c. O.1, s. 66 (1); 2017, c. 34, Sched. 30, s. 4 (1).
While I recognize that Section
63(2) of the Your Province Occupational Health and Safety Act, 1990, states that accessing the health
records of an employee is subject to any other statue (which presumably
includes the Reopening Your Province A Flexible Response to Covid-19} Act, 2020), it is
nonetheless important to highlight this Act, for several reasons. Under Section
28(3) of the Your Provincial Health & Safety Act, it states the following:
Consent to Medical Surveillance
(3)
A worker is not required to participate in a prescribed medical surveillance
program unless the worker consents to do so. R.S.O. 1990, c. O.1,
s. 28.
Under Part IX, Offences and
Penalties it states the following:
Penalties
66 (1) Every person who
contravenes or fails to comply with,
(a) a
provision of this Act or the regulations;
(b) an
order or requirement of an inspector or a Director; or
(c) an
order of the Minister,
is guilty of an offence and on
conviction is liable to a fine of not more than $100,000 or to imprisonment for
a term of not more than twelve months, or to both. R.S.O. 1990,
c. O.1, s. 66 (1); 2017, c. 34, Sched. 30, s. 4 (1).
Furthermore, the Canadian
Charter of Rights and Freedoms Section 2 (a) (freedom of conscience and
religion) and Section 7 (everyone has the right to life, liberty, and security
of person and the right not to be deprived thereof except in accordance with
the principles of fundamental justice), apply to these mandates. Human bodily
autonomy is as basic as it gets in terms of rights. I have the right to liberty
– and this includes my right to refuse medical treatment (including vaccines or
any of the available or future tests for COVID-19).
The PCR test is a form of
genetic test and also would fall under the definition of a medical procedure. The following legislation also applies: Bill S-201,
Statues of Canada 2017: “An Act to prohibit and prevent genetic
discrimination”. In it, it clearly defines “genetic test”: genetic test means a test that analyzes
DNA, RNA or chromosomes for purposes such as the prediction of disease or
vertical transmission risks, or monitoring, diagnosis or prognosis. (test
génétique)
Furthermore, in this
legislation it also outlines Prohibitions:
Prohibitions
Genetic
test
3(1) It is prohibited for
any person to require an individual to undergo a genetic test as a condition of
(a) providing goods or
services to that individual;
(b) entering into or
continuing a contract or agreement with that individual; or
(c ) offering or
continuing specific terms or conditions in a contract or agreement with that
individual.
This legislation also outlines “Offences
and Punishment”
Contravention of
sections 3 to 5
7Every person who
contravenes any of sections 3 to 5 is guilty of an offence
and is liable
(a) on conviction on
indictment, to a fine not exceeding $1,000,000 or to imprisonment for a
term not exceeding five years, or to both; or
(b) on summary
conviction, to a fine not exceeding $300,000 or to imprisonment for a term
not exceeding twelve months, or to both.
Lastly, as indicated by Your Province Public Health numerous times (and as
evidenced in our ICU statistics), vaccinated persons can still get and transmit
COVID-19 despite their inoculation. With this “scientific” evidence, if you
target only the non-disclosed, unvaccinated or accommodated persons under the
Human Rights Code to COVID-19 testing, this is grounds for discrimination. The
testing, hypothetically, is to ensure that you don’t transmit COVID-19 to other
co-workers or the citizens of Your City that you interact with on a regular basis. If you do in
fact outwardly target unvaccinated, accommodated or non-disclosed employees
only, this is grounds for discrimination and harassment and is liable for legal
action. I know the City of Your City and Your Employer take discriminatory behavior very seriously.
I would also like to bring
the City of Your City and the Your Employer attention to the following sections of the Criminal Code of Canada:
Uttering Threats
Uttering threats
·
264.1 (1) Every one commits an offence
who, in any manner, knowingly utters, conveys or causes any person to receive a
threat
·
(a) to cause death or bodily harm to any person;
Punishment
(2) Every one who
commits an offence under paragraph (1)(a) is guilty of
·
(a) an indictable offence and liable to
imprisonment for a term not exceeding five years; or
·
(b) an offence punishable on summary conviction.
Assault
Assault
·
265 (1) A person commits an assault
when
·
(a) without the consent of another person, he
applies force intentionally to that other person, directly or indirectly;
·
(b) he attempts or threatens, by an act or a
gesture, to apply force to another person, if he has, or causes that other
person to believe on reasonable grounds that he has, present ability to effect
his purpose; or
Consent
Consent
(3) For the purposes
of this section, no consent is obtained where the complainant submits or does
not resist by reason of
·
(a) the application of force to the complainant
or to a person other than the complainant;
·
(b) threats or fear of the application of force
to the complainant or to a person other than the complainant;
·
(c) fraud; or
·
(d) the exercise of authority.
Torture
Torture
·
269.1 (1) Every official, or every
person acting at the instigation of or with the consent or acquiescence of an
official, who inflicts torture on any other person is guilty of an indictable
offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding fourteen years.
·
Marginal note:
Definitions
(2) For
the purposes of this section,
official means
·
(a) a peace officer,
·
(b) a public officer,
·
(c) a member of the Canadian Forces, or
·
(d) any person who may exercise powers, pursuant
to a law in force in a foreign state, that would, in Canada, be exercised by a
person referred to in paragraph (a), (b), or (c),
·
whether
the person exercises powers in Canada or outside Canada;(fonctionnaire)
torture means any act or omission by which severe pain or
suffering, whether physical or mental, is intentionally inflicted on a person
·
(a) for a purpose including
·
(i) obtaining from the person or from a third
person information or a statement,
·
(ii) punishing the person for an act that the
person or a third person has committed or is suspected of having committed, and
·
(iii) intimidating or coercing the person or a
third person, or
·
(b) for any reason based on discrimination of any
kind,
but
does not include any act or omission arising only from, inherent in or
incidental to lawful sanctions. (torture)
Extortion:
Extortion
346 (1) Every
one commits extortion who, without reasonable justification or excuse and with intent
to obtain anything, by threats, accusations, menaces or violence induces
or attempts to induce any person, whether or not he is the person
threatened, accused or menaced or to whom violence is shown, to do anything
or cause anything to be done.
Public incitement of hatred:
Public
incitement of hatred
·
319 (1) Every one who, by
communicating statements in any public place, incites hatred against any
identifiable group where such incitement is likely to lead to a breach of the
peace is guilty of
·
(a) an indictable offence and is liable to
imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years; or
·
(b) an offence punishable on summary conviction.
Intimidation:
Intimidation
·
423 (1) Every one is
guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term of not
more than five years or is guilty of an offence punishable on summary
conviction who, wrongfully and without lawful authority, for the purpose of
compelling another person to abstain from doing anything that he or she has a
lawful right to do, or to do anything that he or she has a lawful right to
abstain from doing,
·
(a) uses
violence or threats of violence to that person or their intimate partner or
children, or injures the person’s property;
·
(b) intimidates
or attempts to intimidate that person or a relative of that person by threats
that, in Canada or elsewhere, violence or other injury will be done to or
punishment inflicted on him or her or a relative of his or hers, or that the
property of any of them will be damaged;
·
(c) persistently
follows that person;
·
(d) hides
any tools, clothes or other property owned or used by that person, or deprives
him or her of them or hinders him or her in the use of them;
·
(e) with
one or more other persons, follows that person, in a disorderly manner, on a highway;
·
(f) besets
or watches the place where that person resides, works, carries on business or
happens to be; or
·
(g) blocks
or obstructs a highway.
It is evident that the City
of Your City and Your Employer are in breach
of various federal and provincial legislations, including the Criminal Code of
Canada, as well as case law and their own internal procedures with the recent
COVID-19 vaccine disclose requirement, vaccination and possible testing
mandates. It is not a question of what is politically correct, but rather, what
is lawful. The law is clear: it’s illegal to ask for my personal medical health
information and illegal to mandate any form of treatment, preventative or
otherwise.
In conclusion, I hereby
notify you that I will hold you personally liable for any financial injury
and/or loss of my personal income and my ability to provide food and shelter
for my family if you use coercion or discrimination against me based on my
decision to not participate in Your Employer COVID-19 vaccination and/or testing mandates nor will I
disclose my vaccination status to you.
Your Name: _________________________________
Signature:
_________________________________
Date: ___________________________________
Witness Name:
___________________________________
Witness Signature: ___________________________________
Comments
Post a Comment